As a frequent viewer of the many CSI programmes on the television and a long term admirer of the use of fanciful technology I was initially suspicious of recent announcements from the SPSA, everyone's favourite Quango, that video game imagery would now be used in Scottish Courts.

I had doubts as to whether either Super Mario or Sonic the hedgehog could be of assistance in a trial and wondered as to how Donald Findlay and his like would cross examine Spongebob Squarepants, (a battle of brilliant minds if ever there was one) however having investigated further I am now supportive of such a move.

Any means that supports the truth being told and therefore assists sheriffs, lords and juries to come to a conclusion can only be of benefit. I think it is fair to say that everyone who has the mental capacity to be considered for jury duty will have some knowledge of computer simulation whether that be from designing their own kitchen or bedroom or by clearly showing that the Rangers or Celtic striker (use as best suits your argument) was clearly on/offside, courtesy of Andy Gray and other such commentators.

Very few homes do not have some games device that is able to bring the Second World War, car chases or skateboarding into their living room therefore Joe or Jean average will have a grasp of how a computer image can be representative of a real event.

Naturally such a shift in the presentation of evidence will create a need for "experts" to explain to the jury et all, and that the proof of the acceptance of this type of evidence will require to be tested. As is the case for every other type of forensic or scientific evidence to date "experts" rarely agree, particularly when they are in opposite camps.

Part of the reasoning for this shift towards 3D imagery etc is to do away with the need for courts to visit loci and jurors to view photographs, particularly when either item is gruesome. We should never forget however that every bloody locus and every horrific photograph requires attendance and attention by a police officer or police employee.

They do not have the luxury or comfort that will be provided to others in the shape of a computer graphic. The officer or employee will not be excused the sights, and even worse, the smells of the incident under examination. To enable the "experts" to compile their impressive images the basic steps of an enquiry will still require to be carried out and I have no doubt that the "real life" situations will continue to prey on the minds, and 5 senses, of the individuals charged with securing and analyzing the locus.

Any forward step that assists justice is most welcome but do not, under any circumstances, forget about the effort, professionalism and dedication on the part of the Police Service that gave the "experts" their helping hand.

My one concern is that the use of computer imagery somehow sanitises the event under examination and removes the true gravity and evil from those charged with the power to convict.

Note: The views expressed in The Station Blog are written by neither a Federation representative nor an employee and are not necessarily those of the Joint Central Committee of the Scottish Police Federation.  If you want to comment on the content please email This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it